Advertising

Latest Issue


Happy Hundredth! Weird Words Reaches Its Centennial

As of this week, Webb’s Weird Words has wended its way to 100 articles.

In celebration, your overworked columnist is taking a break from actual lists of oddball terms. Instead, this word-Smith figured faithful readers might enjoy an inside look at how the pieces get written — my process, as it were. And … as most of you already know:

It starts with books.

I’m well on my way to fulfilling a goal to read 1000 titles in retirement; and Lord only knows what the grand-total is since I fell in love with reading as a teen. Yet in nearly every book, I still come across strange terms that I don’t know. (And this sometimes happens with periodicals too — not to mention the occasional episode of Jeopardy!)

Upon finding something odd or unfamiliar, I look it up on my Dictionary.com app — and if it’s in there, I take a screen shot.

(You might think an internet source is not as authoritative as, for example, standard hard-copy dictionaries like Thorndyke Barnhart or Funk & Wagnalls. But by and large, Dictionary.com simply gathers its info from those earlier time-tested tomes.)

Sometimes, if the word can’t be found on the app — as with my recent entry baggywrinkle — I’ll dig for it elsewhere … just because I’m hoping it really is a word!

After a few weeks, I usually have a handful of these screenshots — so I transfer them to my master doc, which now stands at a whopping 3100 words. And since the master isn’t alphabetical, this transfer involves a quick search to make sure it isn’t already there; I added this step last year after discovering that some words were listed three or even four times. (Old man problems — ugh.)

And then, with a Wednesday deadline, I pull out the doc on Tuesday and select about a dozen words at random.

But: After I started “Weird Words” in 2023, I eventually got tired of random lists week after week; so I sometimes mix it up with themes: bird-words, boat-words, holiday words, “kangaroo words” (look it up!), pronunciation, etymology — even a list of totally made-up terms for April Fools this year. (Lzurtz and rotfluxanolol were faves — the latter coined to include two texting abbrevs. for laughter.)

It’s tough to tell how many individual words I can cover on any given week. Some entries generate so much material that I wind up with just six or seven terms in a single piece. For instance: I once did an 800-word article — my max for Webb — entirely on the word peduncle. (Let’s hope that wasn’t as boring as it sounds.)

And then, once I’ve chosen my words for the week, I line them up in alphabetical order and get to work.

First step: pronunciation — which can be tricky. (See several earlier Webb columns on this!) Fact is, English has far more sounds than letters; th and sh, for instance, don’t have their own symbols. So sticklers use the International Phonetic Alphabet, which assigns one of those for each sound (th gets the Greek theta — an “O” with a line through the middle).

Naturally, I can’t use these in my columns — the results looks like gibberish. So, once I’ve figured out proper pronunciation using more traditional renderings (Dictionary.com is reliable), I just do the best I can to spell it out. Not an exact science — but usually sufficient.

(YOU-zyuh-lee suh-FISH-ent.)

As for definitions: By now, readers know I’m an inveterate dictionary-collector (83 at this point — all different); so even though I generally turn to Dictionary.com first, I usually keep 5-10 of my faves near the laptop for reference. Top-choice is my fourth edition of The American Heritage Dictionary, a profusely illustrated eight-pound beauty. I also like Merriam-Webster’s Collegiate, Collins and the Random House College.

Unless I find a definition so clear and terse that I can quote it directly, I like to conflate several of these sources, being careful to give alternate senses where appropriate.

And I usually check the etymology — that is, the word’s origin: what language(s) it came from, along with former spellings and meanings — esp. if related to more familiar terms. (For instance, peduncle — mentioned above — is related to both uncle and the Latin base ped, meaning “foot”; but it took a very long paragraph to explain how!)

And that’s it — except for proofreading and revising, which I consider essential for any writing project (yes, even emails and texts — for you semi-literate, 21st-century cell-junkies!).

I often have a few words left over if the entries run too long; those get saved for later. And of course I then go to my master and check off all terms I used that week.

There’s enough gobbledygook in these pieces without repeating the same word twice — hear, hear!

Oops.